Sign up for a premium account on Subscribestar for AD FREE VIEWING = NO POPS ON ALL DEVICES.

Video

Comments

- Reply
34Critic: Yay for latex nuns. But white guy version as well?
avatar
- Reply
Secone: the chanting cracked me up
avatar
- Reply
ricoaio: Still waiting for a good animation with those hot hitman nuns.
- Reply
mEdge: @34Critic: What the fuck does it matter what color the dick is
- Reply
UnderCoverFap: Latex Victoria, not seen used to often.

The setting is perfect, well done Arnold!

*fapfapfap*
- Reply
slappy1: Yes! More Victoria!
- Reply
sasnid: Love the Hitman nuns!
- Reply
Lazag472: @mEdge: Cuck
- Reply
BBCrulesYOU: @34Critic: If it's so important for you to self-insert as a white person in porn, then just self-insert as the chick.
- Reply
mEdge: @Lazag472: If that's your word for someone who isn't insecure as fuck, then sure.
- Reply
Debthrowaway: I'm with ya, mEdge. I guess some people have a hard time with self-insertion, but the skin colour of the man makes no difference to my mind! Kind of mind-boggling to see how many people get upset over this crap. :)
- Reply
ThatgirlColdbluu91: its only the wrong skin color if its Coach lol
- Reply
Nikushimi: Everyone on edge just because someone asked for a white version. It's simple preference. Personally, I don't get off on black guys fucking. Just not my thing. Of course someone called "BBCrulesYOU" would like it...and they're talking about inserting a white person into porn when I'm sure I know they want to insert black people into porn, and that's fine. Everyone has their preferences, but damn...hostility rose quick over a question.
- Reply
retardus: @Nikushimi: That whole 'preference' thing goes out the window when you have people editing art with extra racist shit to help with their insecurities. You could say that it goes both ways until they have literal swastikas on them and shitty dialogue talking about how inferior the other race is...
- Reply
Nikushimi: @retardus: Not really. Where is the "extra racist shit" that you speak of? They just asked for a white version. Many artists do skin tones. Some don't. Editing in different skin tones isn't extra racist shit...unless you consider being white an instant "you're racist" card...then that's a whole other issue.

Imo, it's not really that bad to ask. You're all just inferring shit about the person.

But to each their own. It's a porn animation. People like them or they don't. I don't enjoy anal animations, and there are some really amazing artists out there who do great work, but the anal kills it for me. *shrugs*
avatar
- Reply
Shadow111: @Nikushimi: It is because asking for a white version on an image that has a different skin tone gets annoying when it is always the first comment. Artists like Hary96 and Mantis-X now have to make two versions of their stuff to stop the edits that happened to their old stuff.
avatar
- Reply
Sugarsparkles: @Shadow111: That's just straight up not representative of reality, like most of these comments, and it goes to show your true colors that you're only bothered by people asking for "white versions", which has only just recently become semi-common, while the opposite has been far more prevalent as a ratio. Not dissimilar, I suppose, to the other people here who would be offended by a swastika, but must be, I guess, perfectly cool with BLACK WORLD ORDER tattoo edits (which were around FAR before the opposite), white slavery roleplay, etc. People like that have been pressuring artists, who are often not black themselves, who are often depicting non-black females, into doing "black male" versions of their work under threat of attempting to label them as a racist and ruin their reputations for far longer and far more than the opposite has been the case (the opposite being called cuck in this case, which is harmless by comparison). Look at the most popular artists today who put out multiple versions, and then look at their body of work before it became popular to harass people over social media.

You might not like to read this, but the truth is that black males in porn, outside of Africa proper, have forever been vastly over-represented, first as a taboo, and now at the forceful demand of a relatively small but relatively loud and threatening group of people. It's also just not a fair comparison to begin with as the vast majority of the female characters being depicted are not black to begin with - it doesn't make sense that they'd be paired with a black male, UNLESS someone IS trying to make a statement about race him or herself. If they're not? Then perhaps they should take their own advice about not need to self-insert. :)
avatar
- Reply
Shadow111: @Sugarsparkles: Don't care, I just want people to stop asking for different skin tone version and different age versions of what the artist originally did. Just be quiet and let artists post what they want.
avatar
- Reply
Sugarsparkles: @Shadow111: Well, that seems unlikely, given that you went to the effort of making the race-specific distinction, how much of your post history is BMWF, and that at least one of those is the type of edit you were complaining about (except black instead... weird)... but I guess I'll just have to take your word for it. Peace :)
- Reply
ludicrous: everyone has a preference, I'm more curious how those hand restraints actually restrain someone.
avatar
- Reply
weiterman: not good