Sign up for a premium account on Subscribestar for AD FREE VIEWING = NO POPS ON ALL DEVICES.

Video

Comments

- Reply
NigNogs: You know, the proper word would probably be 'elasticity' instead of 'plasticity.' Just judging by the context and all
- Reply
lilsuzy: Not a fan of video game harley but at least it's better than that overproduced StudioFOW crap.
- Reply
Krieg: Better than studio fow "story movie".
- Reply
Anonymous1: @Krieg:
Careful, or FOW will say that you're Aardvark fanboy!
- Reply
KillahInstinct: definetly better than studio fow's bullshit
- Reply
Master69: Just 1 time can i have a new Harley thing that's just normal not her getting raped by animals or monsters

Bunch of sick fucks.
- Reply
xigva: You mean you want consensual heterosexual sex in the missionary position with the lights off for the sole purpose of reproduction?

You sick fuck.
- Reply
Anonymous2: You ta with a sensual woman.
The provision "under" ...
Ai instead of you having fun with the gang ...
You play the dogs ... FOW.
That video was shit that is less then have fun ...
They throw her Harley Quinn to dog okay, they put headboards to a dog that shit ...

Here in this video at least and bestial monster humanoide a short video ...
The purpose was better than the rsrsrsrsrs FOW ...
avatar
- Reply
elbatmansfm: I'd rather watch this than the latest FOW release. I just can't get into their storylines, scripts and/or directing. Animations are epic. But everything else detracts from it for me. Normally Aardvark's facial expressions put me off, or tongues always hanging out. But this is sexy and funny
avatar
- Reply
LordAardvark: @NigNogs: Fuck. This is why I need someone to give me oversight on things before I publish them.

@elbatmansfm: I hope you know I fucking HATE the tongues-hanging-out / "ahegao." I think it looks retarded as fuck.

But people keep paying for it.
avatar
- Reply
Das: Yeah, have to agree that this is a lot better than the FOW movie. Good stuff man!
avatar
- Reply
ricoaio: Good. although the original model from Arkham knight is way hotter
- Reply
Anonymous3: not too bad, keyframes feel a bit copy and pasted for a bit there though..
avatar
- Reply
huuu: my mind feels violated at that ending
- Reply
Anonymous4: Were those guys behind the glass fapping? Because it certainly looked like they were
- Reply
Anonymous5: I get it if you flat-out don't like bestiality and rape, but saying this is objectively better than an animation that had hundreds of hours put into it is an insult to FOW's animators.

The action is a half-second mechanical loop repeated for nearly a minute with stock voice clips and slapping sound effects. The camerawork is just above average. The lip syncing is poor but passable.

None of this makes it bad, but it's clear it was made by someone who doesn't have access to the resources to really make a stand-out animation.

Somebody please explain how you compare a loop and climax sequence to a multi-scene, 20min video with original voice acting, and still decide unbiasedly that this is the better of the two. They're on entirely different levels.

As someone who enjoys content from both creators, I implore you guys to just ignore one or the other if you don't like their stuff. Stop fueling this ridiculous fanboy war (which neither face really cares about) and continuously making the SFM porn crowd look worse by being whiny jerks.

Eh, who am I kidding. You probably decided my view was moot once I mentioned Studio FOW, didn't you?
avatar
- Reply
sokumotanaka: ^^^^
- Reply
bobishere: No dogs involved? Praise the sun!
- Reply
Anonymous6: Yes!! No animals involved... I to this day dont understand why bestiality is still a thing. I get monster girls but this is most certainly not that. While FOW ainimation and quality was better, this one is more enjoyable for me simply because no animals were involved.
avatar
- Reply
Greywolf: @Anonymous: Most sensible and respectable direct dissent offered. Stay classy, sir/madam. ^_^-b

Also, I agree. Beastiality is not one of my preferred kinks and I rather have my porn without it. But, hey. Patrons gonna patron.

@Illios: @Anonymous: /Signed for complete truth. Studio FOWs work is amazingly well done 90% of the time and, even if they showcase a kink I'm not into,

I can recognize the talent and time put in to create the work. And that's not to say that a vast majority of Aardvark's work is not stellar as well, mind you. Let's just keep things in perspective, ne?
- Reply
Anonymous7: Anonymous 5 not always
great productions
Are the best
Ta full of gaming, movies ... Triple-A
What are crap.
- Reply
Anonymous8: I see the aardvark-drones are out in force again..any retard can see he just shit this out quickly to try and compete with FOW but failed miserably
- Reply
Anonymous9: @Anonymous: still better than the FOW "big fish in the pond mentality" circlejerk squad. I guess you are one of them.
- Reply
residentlover2: yeah fuck I was expecting more from fow but only dog shit come on